AI Companions May Widen the Midlife Friendship Gap

Full analysis

Psychologist Suzanne Degges-White, writing in Psychology Today, argues that AI companions are increasingly attractive to midlife adults precisely because they remove the friction of real relationships — they never cancel, always respond, and never disappoint. But that frictionlessness may be the problem: human friendships, including their conflicts, misunderstandings, and demands for patience, are where people develop resilience, empathy, and conflict-management skills. AI companions can simulate dependability and empathy while requiring none of the emotional labor that genuine friendship asks of us.

Degges-White identifies several midlife transitions — empty nests, retirement, divorce, widowhood, and moves to care for aging parents or be near adult children — that simultaneously increase the need for close friends and erode existing social networks. She cites recent research (Yong et al., 2026) raising concerns that AI companions may pose hazards to the human relationships that sustain us. Her conclusion: AI companions used as a supplement when friends are scarce may serve a purpose, but using them as a replacement risks raising expectations for human friendship to an unrealistic standard and leaving people less able to tolerate the ordinary imperfections of real relationships.